Choose based on real meeting volume
If meeting volume changes week to week, a $0 monthly charge plus a $0.92 per processed hour rate makes the cost easier to connect to value.
Compare
Pay-as-you-go vs subscription AI meeting notes
The right pricing model depends on how often you actually need AI notes. Salyn is designed for the people who do not want another standing subscription.
Answer first
Pay-as-you-go AI meeting notes fit irregular meeting volume because Salyn has a $0 monthly charge and costs $0.92 per processed hour; subscription note takers fit teams with predictable, high meeting volume.
Comparison
Clear tradeoffs before you pick a note taker
| Topic | Salyn | Traditional subscription |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Irregular, selective, or bursty meeting processing. | Predictable weekly meeting volume. |
| Cost model | $0 monthly charge plus $0.92 per processed hour. | Monthly plan cost, often independent of actual usage. |
| Control | Review estimate before spending credits. | Costs are usually committed before usage is known. |
Estimate before processing
Salyn shows billable minutes before a recording is processed, which gives you a moment to decide if the meeting is worth spending credits on.
FAQ
Questions people ask before trying Salyn
When is pay-as-you-go better?
Pay-as-you-go is better when you process important meetings occasionally, have seasonal call volume, or want to avoid paying for idle months.
When is a subscription better?
A subscription can be better when a team processes many meetings every week and needs bundled collaboration or live attendance features.
Try Salyn on a real meeting
Upload one recording, review the estimate, and process it only if the notes are worth the credits.